US finalizes restrictions on investments in tech

view original post

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The administration of President Joe Biden has finalized curbs on US investments in sensitive technologies like semiconductors in China that pose a threat to national security, the Treasury Department said on Monday.

The new rules, which take effect on Jan. 2 next year, will prohibit US-headquartered firms, citizens and permanent residents from engaging in transactions involving cutting-edge technology like semiconductors, artificial intelligence and quantum computing, the Treasury announced in a statement.

Investors will also be required to inform the Treasury about investments in some less advanced technologies “that may contribute to the threat to the national security of the United States,” the statement added.

SAFEGUARD The Treasury Building is viewed in Washington on May 4, 2021. The US Treasury Department on Monday released a rule to monitor and restrict US investments in China on technology-related matters. AP photo

This will include investment in legacy semiconductors, a senior administration official told reporters on Monday.

Get the latest news


delivered to your inbox
Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters

By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

“Artificial intelligence, semiconductors and quantum technologies are fundamental to the development of the next generation of military, surveillance, intelligence and certain cybersecurity applications,” Paul Rosen, Treasury assistant secretary for investment security, said in a statement.

“This final rule takes targeted and concrete measures to ensure that US investment is not exploited to advance the development of key technologies by those who may use them to threaten our national security,” he added.

The rules are the result of an executive order signed by Biden last August aimed at restricting certain US investments in sensitive high-tech areas in China, including in Hong Kong and Macao.

In response, China’s foreign ministry called the executive order an attempt to “engage in anti-globalization and de-sinicization,” adding that Beijing was “strongly dissatisfied” and reserved the right to safeguard its interests.